Food security and food assistance dynamics in NYS

Project Overview

Food security and private and public food assistance dynamics in NYS

To understand how people use food assistance programs and to better support those facing food insecurity, we need better data. This project developed novel methods to match and analyze large data sets from private and public food assistance programs. Our initial findings have been of considerable interest to both private food assistance program managers and to government agencies. Our work is already informing research by USDA ERS, the Census Bureau, The Food Bank of the Southern Tier, Rochester-based FoodLink, and others.

To better support people facing food insecurity, we need better data: Current measures of food insecurity provide snapshots of how many people are using food assistance resources, but don’t elucidate whether food insecurity is a temporary or chronic problem for individuals and families. Further, to support good public policy, we need more information about whether food-insecure people are relying on private food pantries instead of, or in addition to, public programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

To understand how clients use food assistance programs, and how policy changes in public food assistance impact private food pantries, we constructed a novel data set that matched administrative client use records from the Food Bank of the Southern Tier, which services the food pantries in a six-county region of Upstate New York, with similar administrative client data from SNAP in the same region. The resulting data set is, to the best of our knowledge, the first and largest such matched private and public food assistance data set in existence. To study longer-term food security dynamics, we developed a new measure that can be applied to existing, long-standing household survey data: the Probability of Food Security (PFS), which represents the estimated probability that a household’s food expenditure equals or exceeds the minimal cost of a healthful diet, based on the USDA’s Thrifty Food Plan cost. PFS is calculated using simple household food expenditure data, rather than the more complex household food security survey module used by USDA (Food Security Scale Score – FSSS). We find that PFS and FSSS are strongly and positively correlated and that their associations with household attributes are consistent, indicating that our simpler PFS model is a useful complement to the FSSS. 

The Impacts

PFS enables us to generate much longer time series of household-specific food insecurity measures because far more survey data sets include food expenditure data than FSSS data. Further, PFS is a continuous measure useful for studying the depth of food insecurity among distinct subpopulations. We find, for example, that two-thirds of US households experienced no food insecurity from 2001-2017, and among food insecure households, more than half regain food security within two years. Households headed by female, non-White, or less educated individuals disproportionately suffer persistent, chronic, and/or severe food insecurity. The most food-insecure group (households headed by a non-White woman with no more than a high school education) is 15 times more likely to suffer food insecurity than is the most food-secure group (households headed by White men with a college education). 

Our initial findings have been of considerable interest to both private food assistance program managers and to government agencies. Our work is already informing research by USDA ERS, the Census Bureau, The Food Bank of the Southern Tier, Rochester-based FoodLink, and others.

Portrait of Christopher Barrett

Principal Investigator

Project Details

  • Funding Source: Hatch
  • Statement Year: 2023
  • Status: Completed project
  • Topics: Healthy communities, food security, nutrition, youth and families